Both halves of the ticket, in the shape vessels have used since gas bombers
and laser ships: a definition carries an ore figure and, when it wants more
than ore, a dictionary that IS the price. `building_costs()` and
`skill_costs()` answer it the way `product_costs()` already did, so there is
one question with one answer whatever is being bought, and every payment
path now goes through `spend_resources` rather than `spend`.
Seven of ten structures and thirteen of seventeen doctrines now want gas,
energy or dark matter alongside their rocks, and the totals climb with tree
depth - structures 16/31/58/62/96 by depth, doctrines 15/30/73/96/143/258/530.
The constraint that shaped the table is REACHABILITY, and it is the reason
some prices stayed ore-only. Energy exists only where a gas burner stands,
and a gas burner needs Power Systems - so nothing at or before that depth
may be priced in energy, or it is a wall with no way through. Dark matter is
rarer still and appears once, on the deepest node in the game. The extractor
stays rocks-only despite its depth allowing gas, because the quest chain
reaches it before it has sent the player for any.
test_progressive_costs checks those as properties rather than transcribing
the numbers, so rebalancing a price costs nothing while breaking the shape
fails: nothing unreachable at its own depth, prices rising with depth, the
ore field agreeing with the dictionary (repairs quote the field alone, since
a repair drone carries ore and nothing else), and the quest chain never
asking for a structure it has not funded.
Two things cleaned up on the way:
- The per-building cost constants in GameState are gone. Nothing but tests
used them, and they were a second copy of a number the definitions already
hold - exactly what would drift once a price gained a resource.
- research_for_building() returns a display NAME, and the id-keyed half of
the tree wants an id. That mix-up is silent - skill_depth() of a name finds
no node and answers 0, so a deep structure reads as an ungated one, which
is how the first draft of the test let an unreachable price through.
research_node_for_building() is the id, and the name is expressed from it.
PriceTag no longer rebuilds its labels when re-told the same price; it
refreshes the held figures instead. The craft menu re-states prices every
frame and the build menu now does too, so that was a dozen Labels being torn
down and rebuilt sixty times a second.
The previous ten tickets shipped with almost no coverage - only #109, #113,
#115 and #117 touched a test. That was a gap, not a decision: everything
before it had its behaviour pinned, and #116 in particular added a whole
subsystem nothing was watching.
Four new files and one extended case:
test_spacial_workshop #116 - the repair economy end to end: the
cost of a repair scales with the damage, the
workshop asks logistics for that ore and
stops at its buffer, a drone spends when it
LEAVES so two cannot double-charge one wall,
and a target levelled in flight sends its
load home rather than swallowing it
test_desktop_controls #118/#121 - both driven through the real
routing, because the routing is what was
missing; a test calling handle_mouse_button()
itself would have passed against both reports
test_enemy_bomber #114 - it flies, it faces where it flies, its
bombs arrive, and it bombs structures with no
fleet in sight
test_menu_polish #111/#112/#119/#120 - what each panel shows
test_wave_system (case G) #110 - the dev button, and that it does not
exist outside dev mode
One assertion worth recording: the craft caption is checked as an EXACT
match against the vessel's display name rather than by hunting for resource
words in it. The first version failed on "Gas Bomber" - a vessel named after
a resource, and always will be. What #111 removed was the price spelled out
underneath, not the name.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
