spaceship/enemies/EnemyRangedWeaponComponent.gd

49 lines
1.7 KiB
GDScript3
Raw Permalink Normal View History

class_name EnemyRangedWeaponComponent
extends Node
# Same shape as VesselWeaponComponent, mirrored for an enemy: fires an
# EnemyProjectile at the nearest player ship's CURRENT position, not led,
# so a moving ship can dodge it.
var capability_id: String = "ranged_weapon"
@export var fire_range: float = 700.0
@export var fire_cooldown: float = 2.2
@export var projectile_speed: float = 260.0
@export var damage: int = 1
var fire_timer: float = 0.0
#84: move 215 root files into a folder hierarchy Everything lived in one flat directory, so a diff gave no clue what area it touched and finding the file you wanted meant knowing its exact name. Twelve folders now, grouped by what a thing IS rather than what type it is - a vessel's definition, its component scenes and its upgrade resources sit together, because that is the set you read when you change one of them. buildings core controllers enemies logistics planets resources shaders surface ui vessels vfx world 332 files moved and every res:// reference rewritten - 306 files touched, including the autoload and main-scene paths in project.godot. Nothing renamed: this is purely where files sit, so the diff is a pile of pure moves and no behaviour is buried in it. ui_theme.tres, icon.svg and web_shell.html stay at the root, where Godot and the export preset expect them. Verified three ways, because a suite alone would not have caught all of it: the full 117 pass, the web export builds clean, and the game renders. The export is why that matters. The FIRST export after the move failed with "Attempt to open script 'res://GameState.gd'" - the old path - while project.godot on disk plainly said res://core/GameState.gd. That is this project's documented Android FUSE mtime trap: Godot served a cached copy of a file whose content had changed. A `touch` fixed it. Nothing in the test suite would have found that, because the suite runs from a copy on a native filesystem - the one place the bug cannot happen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 19:44:14 +02:00
var projectile_scene: PackedScene = preload("res://enemies/EnemyProjectile.tscn")
func tick(delta: float) -> void:
fire_timer -= delta
if fire_timer > 0.0:
return
var enemy: Node2D = get_parent()
var target: Node2D = _nearest_ship_in_range(enemy)
if target == null:
fire_timer = 0.25
return
var projectile: Area2D = projectile_scene.instantiate()
# global_position: the projectile is reparented to root, a different
# node than the enemy's own (possibly nested) parent, so local
# position would be wrong the moment an enemy isn't a direct root
# child - exactly the case #44 introduced (planet-surface hosting).
projectile.position = enemy.global_position
projectile.damage = damage
projectile.speed = projectile_speed
enemy.get_tree().root.add_child(projectile)
projectile.launch(target.global_position - enemy.global_position)
fire_timer = fire_cooldown
#101 (#97c): waves attack buildings Every enemy component used to ask the same question - which player SHIP is nearest - so a structure was scenery they flew straight through. A Building is also a plain Node2D, so there was nothing to collide with even if one had tried. EnemyTargets answers the question once, for pursuit, standoff, the lancer's lunge and the ranged weapon together, so they cannot drift into disagreeing about it. It keeps one thumb on the scale: a vessel inside 520px always wins, even against a nearer building, or the fleet could not defend anything by interposing itself and an enemy would fly past the ships shooting it. Buildings get a hitbox - an Area2D in a group, the same shape as a Ship or an asteroid, so EnemyProjectile needed one extra branch rather than a new concept. It applies damage on a tick rather than on area_entered: entry fires once, which is right for a rammer that dies on the first strike, but would let a sniper that drifted inside sit there scratch-free for ever. On a tick, an enemy parked on a structure is besieging it. What one strike costs is data on the enemy definition, for the same reason dies_on_contact is - a lancer arriving at 950px/s is not a sniper drifting into a wall. Also clears the asteroids in test_enemy_projectile_damage. set_process(false) only stops NEW asteroids; the ones already placed keep drifting, and one wandering into the shield vessel parked at (2000, 0) spent its single charge so the projectile fired next killed it. That failed about one parallel suite run in thirty and never in isolation. Clearing them is what the other combat tests already do. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-23 13:53:17 +02:00
# #101: shoots at whatever EnemyTargets says it is coming for, so a sniper
# shells a depot rather than sitting in range of one doing nothing.
func _nearest_ship_in_range(enemy: Node2D) -> Node2D:
#101 (#97c): waves attack buildings Every enemy component used to ask the same question - which player SHIP is nearest - so a structure was scenery they flew straight through. A Building is also a plain Node2D, so there was nothing to collide with even if one had tried. EnemyTargets answers the question once, for pursuit, standoff, the lancer's lunge and the ranged weapon together, so they cannot drift into disagreeing about it. It keeps one thumb on the scale: a vessel inside 520px always wins, even against a nearer building, or the fleet could not defend anything by interposing itself and an enemy would fly past the ships shooting it. Buildings get a hitbox - an Area2D in a group, the same shape as a Ship or an asteroid, so EnemyProjectile needed one extra branch rather than a new concept. It applies damage on a tick rather than on area_entered: entry fires once, which is right for a rammer that dies on the first strike, but would let a sniper that drifted inside sit there scratch-free for ever. On a tick, an enemy parked on a structure is besieging it. What one strike costs is data on the enemy definition, for the same reason dies_on_contact is - a lancer arriving at 950px/s is not a sniper drifting into a wall. Also clears the asteroids in test_enemy_projectile_damage. set_process(false) only stops NEW asteroids; the ones already placed keep drifting, and one wandering into the shield vessel parked at (2000, 0) spent its single charge so the projectile fired next killed it. That failed about one parallel suite run in thirty and never in isolation. Clearing them is what the other combat tests already do. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-23 13:53:17 +02:00
var target: Node2D = EnemyTargets.nearest_target(self, enemy.global_position)
if target == null:
return null
if enemy.global_position.distance_to(target.global_position) > fire_range:
return null
#101 (#97c): waves attack buildings Every enemy component used to ask the same question - which player SHIP is nearest - so a structure was scenery they flew straight through. A Building is also a plain Node2D, so there was nothing to collide with even if one had tried. EnemyTargets answers the question once, for pursuit, standoff, the lancer's lunge and the ranged weapon together, so they cannot drift into disagreeing about it. It keeps one thumb on the scale: a vessel inside 520px always wins, even against a nearer building, or the fleet could not defend anything by interposing itself and an enemy would fly past the ships shooting it. Buildings get a hitbox - an Area2D in a group, the same shape as a Ship or an asteroid, so EnemyProjectile needed one extra branch rather than a new concept. It applies damage on a tick rather than on area_entered: entry fires once, which is right for a rammer that dies on the first strike, but would let a sniper that drifted inside sit there scratch-free for ever. On a tick, an enemy parked on a structure is besieging it. What one strike costs is data on the enemy definition, for the same reason dies_on_contact is - a lancer arriving at 950px/s is not a sniper drifting into a wall. Also clears the asteroids in test_enemy_projectile_damage. set_process(false) only stops NEW asteroids; the ones already placed keep drifting, and one wandering into the shield vessel parked at (2000, 0) spent its single charge so the projectile fired next killed it. That failed about one parallel suite run in thirty and never in isolation. Clearing them is what the other combat tests already do. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-23 13:53:17 +02:00
return target